Friday, July 10, 2009

Obama, Ghana, and African oil


The West African Gulf of Guinea is not only oil rich, but
also the corridor for transporting West African oil to the
rest of the world. Controlling the Gulf of Guinea is a
principal goal of AFRICOM, the U.S. Africa Command.

Barack Obama's visit to Ghana is, most fundamentally, about West African oil and natural gas, and control of the corridors for transporting it through the Gulf of Guinea, on the West African Coast. Full text at Examiner.com, http://tinyurl.com/lr43qw.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

KMEC Radio 101.5: Alberto Torrico on Arnold Schwarzenegger's end game

Alberto Torrico on Arnold Schwarzenegger's end game.

Cross post from the Op-Ed News, http://www.opednews.com/articles/KMEC-105-1FM--Alberto-Tor-by-Ann-Garrison-090707-368.html.

Marwa el-Sherbini murdered by European anti-Islam racist

It has now been five days since Marwa el-Sherbini has been murdered by a European racist, still German and Dutch press have not written about the incidents. A German citizen had called Marwa el-Sherbini a terrorist whore. Later, in the courtroom, he stabbed her to death.

This demonstrates again that migrants in Europe have nothing to expect from mainstream politics and media.

Arnold Schwarzenegger threatens California like the IMF threatens Africa



California, like Africa, is oil rich. Africa has surpassed the Middle
East as a source of U.S. oil imports,and California is third to
Texas and Alaska, as an oil producing state. Yet most Africans enjoy
none of the wealth consequent to oil extraction in their
homeland, much like Californians, who, charge no oil and
natural gas severance tax at the wellhead, unlike any
state in the U.S., and, unlike even any African state.
by Ann Garrison

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger now threatens California much as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank threaten debt strangled, resource ransacked, environmentally assaulted, and de facto colonized Africa, and the rest of the Global South. In negotiations over the budget deadlock that now has California operating on CA IOUs, he's demands that majority Democratic California Legislature repeal years of hard won labor and environmental protection in exchange for his signature on a budget that saves at least some of the most basic human services.

If enacted without amendment, his harsh budget cuts will end many California college students' educations, and, sentence the most vulnerable Californians to extreme privation, and, even death; some Californians will literally die without AIDS medication, in home health services, health care for children, and other very basic social services that Schwarzenegger insists California can no longer afford.

Why is California no longer able to afford basic decency and dignity?

Because Schwarzenegger and his Republican minority:

1) Refuse to ask the wealthiest Californians, and corporations, to join in what he himself calls "shared sacrifice."

2) Refuse to ask Big Oil, despite record profits, to join in the "shared sacrifice," by refusing to impose an oil and natural gas tax at the wellhead, in this state which so uniquely charges none.

3) Don't even propose trimming all the State's outright contributions to corporations, in "public private partnerships" for infrastructural development, and/or, subsidies, to California's enormously wealthy utility monopolies, like Pacific Gas'n Electric and Southern California Edison.

California is the world's eighth largest economy, and, the largest state in the U.S.A. If Arnold Schwarzenegger's harsh end game succeeds here, it will no doubt send shock waves of corporatist triumph around the world.

On June 30, 2009, I recorded this KMEC Radio interview with California Assembly Majority Leader Alberto Torrico, on Arnold Schwarzenegger's budget and agenda, crossposted here from the Op-Ed News, http://tinyurl.com/mcandh.

Monday, July 6, 2009

Evangelische Utopisten

In maart sprak Arie Slob, fractievoorzitter van de ChristenUnie, met Henk van Rhee, de voormalige direkteur van het partijbureau van de ChristenUnie. Arie Slob zegt over dit gesprek "Met Henk van Rhee voel ik me ook geestelijk verbonden".

De verbondenheid waar Arie Slob aan refereert lijkt verdacht veel op de droom van Henk van Rhee:
"Ik filosofeer wel eens over een toekomstige fusie tussen de nieuwe generatie SGP'ers en het orthodoxe deel van de ChristenUnie. Misschien verdwijnt de rest van de CU dan naar het CDA. Ook kerkelijk zou er wel eens een herverkaveling kunnen plaatsvinden, waarin orthodoxe mensen elkaar over kerkmuren heen vinden."


Om te begrijpen waarover Henk van Rhee hier filosofeert is het nuttig om het volgende citaat uit een artikel dat verscheen op de opinie-pagina van het Reformatorisch Dagblad er bij te pakken:
"Om het orthodoxe deel van de CU-achterban tevreden te houden, zal er "op de een of andere manier'' een beperking gesteld moeten worden aan homoseksuele relaties bij vertegenwoordigers van de partij.

Voor het 'verlichte' deel van de achterban zal dat aanleiding zijn om hun politieke onderdak elders te zoeken, verwacht Van Rhee."


Het is duidelijk uit bovenstaande interview, dat Henk van Rhee alleen "geestelijke verbondenheid" voelt met een deel van de achterban van de ChristenUnie. Hij streeft er naar een in zijn ogen 'verlichte' deel de partij uit te jagen.

En daarin staat hij duidelijk niet alleen, want de beperking die hij wilde is er inderdaad gekomen:

"Het ChristenUniepartijcongres nam op 14 juni de aanbevelingen uit het rapport over de gedragscode voor CU-vertegenwoordigers over. Wel werd de code gewijzigd. Kiesvereniging Nunspeet scherpte hem aan met een verwijzing naar de Uniefundering en het kernprogramma. Dat laatste werd op verzoek van Barneveld uitgebreid met de passage dat „seksuele omgang onlosmakelijk is verbonden met het huwelijk.”


De "homodiscussie" legt hier een diepere breuklijn in Christelijke politiek bloot. Een belangrijk deel van de ChristenUnie leden streeft een conservatief-evangelisch ideaal na, gebaseerd op het succes van de EO. Daarbij wordt ten onrechte de suggestie gewekt dat diegenen die daarin niet meegaan "progressief", "liberaal", "vrijzinnig" of "links" zijn. Dat blijkt ook uit de suggestie van Henk van Rhee die deze groep graag zou zien vertrekken richting het CDA.

Dat deel van de leden streeft juist niet naar de "evangelische utopie" van Henk van Rhee, maar geeft invulling aan haar burgerschap in lijn met het denkwerk van mensen als Groen van Prinsterer, Abraham Kuyper, Klaas Schilder en anderen die hun bijdrage geleverd hebben aan de fundering van Christelijke politiek in hun tijd.

De "evangelische utopie" van Henk van Rhee doet dan ook geen recht aan de complexe ontstaansgeschiedenis van RPF en GPV. Van Rhee gaat daarmee bovendien volledig voorbij aan de discussie over "kracht en doel" van Christelijke politiek die leidde tot het ontstaan van het GPV in 1948.

Hoe harder "evangelische utopisten" (zoals Henk van Rhee) blijven proberen de complexe realiteit van Christelijke politiek in hun "Evangelisch-conservatieve" keurslijf te dwingen, hoe meer tegenwerking zij tegen zullen komen binnen de ChristenUnie. It's the "burgerschapsvisie" stupid.

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Torrico says "No more sequels, Arnold," as the Terminator holds a gun to California's head







Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's
budget is a gun held to California's head.

Jimi Hendrix Star Spangled Banner, Woodstock, 1969

by Ann Garrison

Posted five minutes after midnight, July 4th, American Independence Day, 2009, 40 years after Hendrix made history at Woodstock, as the U.S. continues its overt wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and its covert wars in Africa, most of all, in D.R. Congo, under the umbrella of Africom, the U.S. Africa Command. I didn't watch the fireworks, but I listened to this, which Hendrix performed at the height of America's War in Vietnam, and the height of global opposition:

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Alberto Torrico urges California Democrats to lead

"If we are not going to take care of the most vulnerable among us, then I see no reason for us to be here in Sacramento."
--Assembly Majority Leader Alberto Torrico

Assembly Majority Leader Alberto Torrico urged California Democrats, a majority in both houses of the state legislature, to discard Arnold Schwarzenegger’s immoral, inhumane budget and present him with their own—so as to negotiate from strength, rather than simply defending this or that program from cuts. Thus far, the State Democrats have failed to follow his lead.

The Schwarzenegger budget is a hugely aggressive attempt to further advance the neoconservative agenda:

1) Shred the social safety net.
2) Privatize anything and everything.
3) Slash personal and corporate income tax.
4) Use state revenues to fund privatization, via “public private” partnerships.
5) Deconstruct environmental and business regulation by defunding enforcement.

That’s a very clear vision, as it has been for a long time. Will State Democrats ever articulate and argue for an equally clear vision, so as to mount more than a feeble defense against such vicious, aggressive neoconservativism? And, against neoliberalism, i.e., neoconservatism with a smiley, civil libertarian, sex tolerant face?

With Bill Clinton, the Democratic Party, on the national level, became the Neoliberal party, virtually indistinguishable from the Republicans, and, at times, on the national level, became even more vicious, as evidenced by the recent overwhelming Democratic vote to fund another $106 billion to fight the global War on Terror, an ideological excuse for unbridled military expansion and corporate plunder of the people and the planet for profit. And, $100 billion to fund the International Monetary Fund, which strangles the Global South in debt for projects more often harmful, and exploitative, of the people who live there, than not.

However, on the state level, the Democratic Party continues to stand, albeit timidly, or, perhaps, halfheartedly, against the Republicans, for community, and commitment to taking care of one another, in opposition to the privatization of everything existing. An oil and gas severance tax, at the wellhead, for oil that belongs to the people of the State of California, is part of the California Democratic Party platform, but Republicans adamantly oppose even a 9.9% tax, despite higher taxes in both Texas and California, the two oil-producing states ahead of California in barrels of crude pumped out of the ground.

Schwarzenegger's cuts will cost billions more in federal funds

Schwarzenegger’s cuts at the state level will cost California more billions in federal funds,
largely funds for human services, than the state cuts themselves. What could make the governor's real agenda more apparent?

If it advances yet further in California, it’s likely to spread, though California is not the first state to have a supermajority rule, Proposition 13, which requires that the entire California State budget be approved by a 2/3 majority, meaning, effectively, by the minority. California Democrats are now four votes shy of a 2/3 majority in the State Assembly; two votes shy in the State Senate.

supermajority (minority) rule is a national movement, which the Heritage Foundation, a think tank to enrich the rich, has been promoting it since at least 1996,

To protest the California budget, call Arnold Schwarzenegger's office, 916-445-2841.
Protest locally, protest in Sacramento.
Create media; call media; protest any media failing to accurately characterize Arnold Schwarzenegger's agenda.




-Steve Rhodes
17 Arrests at San Francisco protest of Arnold Schwarzenegger's California State Budget; June 24, 2009.

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Why should Ahmed Aboutaleb not meet the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Morocco?


A political row started today between the Mayor of Rotterdam, who visited Cassablanca this week, and the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs, Maxime Verhagen.

Last year, when world media was all on Geert Wilders and the coming out of his film Fitna, Dutch Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Verhagen sent Social Affairs State Secretary Ahmed Aboutaleb to represent the Dutch government at an EU meeting with the Arab League in the Maltese capital Valetta.

Verhagen had asked Aboutaleb to deputise for him, according to Aboutaleb. He gave as a reason that they "sometimes exchange ideas about the Middle East" but acknowledged that the fact that he is an Arab and a Muslim played a role. "It sometimes goes a bit easier if you get it in a word," said the state secretary. He holds Moroccan as well as Dutch citizenship.

Today Verhagen is "very angry" because Ahmed Aboutaleb, who is now the Mayor of Rotterdam, had a meeting with the minister for foreign affairs of Morocco while he was visiting his country of origin.

Apparently Maxime Verhagen, the Foreign Affairs Minister, has become very nervous because of the rise of Geert Wilders in the polls. He apparently needs to start a war of words with this important Dutch politician of Moroccan origin to gain back some of his standing with the xenophobic voters in the gutters of for instance Rotterdam and the Hague.

Or is it frustration because of the fact that Dutch-American relations were better under Bush? Apparently Maxime Verhagen, an important CDA politician, thinks he and his party can gain from attacking this politician of Moroccan origin, who the Guardian labeled "Obama of the Maas", on this unimportant issue. It tells us a lot of how the ruling parties are dealing with Geert Wilders.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Deputy Mayor of The Hague: immigrants from Eastern Europe are not welcome!



Update: some pictures of the beauty of The Hague to forget about politicians.

Deputy Mayor Marnix Norder writes today in a national newspaper "Trouw" that he fears a new "migrant drama", referring to the book "multicultureel drama" written by social democrat Paul Scheffer. The reason he has fears is that he has listened to "citizens" and has heard a lot of complaints about Bulgarian and Romanian immigrants in the poorer neighbourhoods. He thinks the feelings in the poor neighbourhoods is that the floodgates are opened to foreigners and that explains the rise of Geert Wilders in the European parliamentary elections.

He says "though he is no Eurofoob, this is Brussels fault" and that "an integration course for these immigrants should be mandator. He would prefer "that the borders would be closed for these immigrants".

Apparently politicians of the Dutch Labour Party are in panic because of the European elections results. This guy, Marnix Norder, a career politician, is wildly hitting around thinking he might get back some PVV voters. What strikes me is the lack of legal or statistical backing for his claims.

A report from the CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) shows that due to international organisations in The Hague the number of western immigrants in The Hague will go up.
The share of western immigrants will go from 10% in 2005 to 20% in 2025. The share of non-western immigrants will stay around 30%. So his claims of a new wave of poor immigrants are only based on what he heard in the neighbourhoods and contradicted by this report.

Secondly the rights of Eastern European immigrants to stay in the Netherlands is guaranteed by European laws, and will not be changed. That is a fact and he should explain the fundamental rights of these citizens to these socalled "citizens" that complain about Eastern Europeans moving. Marnix Norder should go into the neighbourhoods and say: I got news for you, these people are European citizens and have the fundamental right to move in and to speak their own language. They can't be forced to follow some "integration course".

The Dutch Labour Party is riding the wave of xenophobic politics. This will only lead to more division and more unrest. If Marnix Norder really had any concern for his constituency and for the citizens of The Hague he would start by explaining reality, not spreading rumors and inuendo. I hope his constituency in the "City of Peace and Justice" gives him what he deserves at the next election: Defeat!